Monday, December 2, 2013

Pavlov's Dog - Pampered Menial (1975 us, significant progressive rock, 2013 remaster)

While 1974 is considered to be the closure for classic English progressive rock, it was a promising, groundbreaking year for the Americans in the genre, with bands like Kansas and Rush releasing their debut albums. Pampered Menial, the forgotten debut album by St. Louis band Pavlov’s Dog, serves as a further testament to this.

Pavlov’s Dog can actually be the missing piece linking Kansas and Rush – mixing the accessibility of the first with the harder edge of the latter. While not as aggressive as early Rush efforts, Pampered Menial offers about 35 minutes packed with well-written, captivating songs that are dense with instrumental beauty and creativity – creating a sense of celebration from one side and a painful heartbreak affair on the other.

This concentrated, orchestrated work is clearly inspired by early European progressive rock albums (a sub-genre known as "proto-prog"), such as King Crimson’s In the Court of the Crimson King and Spring (another forgotten gem), with various keyboards, mellotron, flutes and strings being a substantial part of the work aside the varied guitar playing, giving it a symphonic touch. It all rocks with intensity, driven by highly dynamic, imaginative drumming, and filled with melody, much in the way Kansas did in their early days.

Lead vocalist David Surkamp’s high singing is very close to that of Rush’s Geddy Lee, both in tone and in delivery. In fact, Surkamp takes his muscular-feminine vibrating vocals to an even more extreme point, using them with more confidence than early Lee, in a way that can be seen as a cross between Lee and the goat-like trembling vocals that Family’s (a late 60’s-70’s outfit that offered orchestrated prog-pop material) Roger Chapman is remembered for.

In fact, Surkamp is not the only one who is performing with confidence. The entire band performs remarkably well and displays maturity and refinement that are sometimes absent from debut albums. Unlike the Led Zeppelin-ish early Rush, Pavlov’s Dog managed to bring on their debut a polished sound that is their own, thus making it a mandatory acquisition to anyone who is interested in American progressive rock.
by Avi Shaked
1. Julia - 3:10
2. Late November (S. Scorfina, D. Surkamp) - 3:12
3. Song Dance (Mike Safron) - 4:59
4. Fast Gun - 3:04
5. Natchez Trace (Steve Scorfina) - 3:42
6. Theme From Subway Sue - 4:25
7. Episode - 4:04
8. Preludin (Siegfried Carver) - 1:39
9. Of Once And Future Kings - 5:28
All songs by David Surkamp except where stated

Pavlov's Dog
*David Surkamp - Lead Vocals, Guitar
*David Hamilton - Keyboards
*Doug Rayburn - Mellotron, Flute
*Mike Safron - Percussion
*Rick Stockton - Bass Guitar
*Siegfried Carver - Violin, Vitar, Viola
*Steve Scorfina - Lead Guitar

Free Text


  1. When I hear this album for the first time,and this was a long time ago,it sounds some kind a strange to me.After a few listening I realize how great album I hold in my hand...

  2. Crimson's first is not proto-prog. Proto-prog refers to music part using the forms of progressive music that were fully formed in subsequent bands, Court being usually accepted as the first fully fledged progressive album, although Nice had laid down several precedents and Moody Blues were noodling towards it (IMHO). Proto-prog: e.g. Touch, Vanilla Fudge, even some of longer Doors tunes

  3. Να εισαι παντα καλα,εισαι συγκινητικος.

  4. This review doesnt really get you anywhere- so heres mine. Ive had this vinyl since the day.
    And simply Pavlovs Dog is pretty much about Surchamps vocals.
    The band is there and they are fine progressive players but like as the reviewer mentions, but doesnt really explain in a relevant way.....there is a connection to the band Family. And that is when Surchamp sings thats what you hear- like Chapman in Family.
    Perhaps in all honesty Family playing is more evident and sometimes you can hear them dominantly.
    But as a long time fan of both bands-
    if you get into them, collect them, play them
    ..... what happens for me is sometimes it will work for you and sometimes not and you wont want to hear them.
    Lastly the Rush and Kansas comparisons are meaningless to me. I have no interest in either. But to look for a relation to Surchamps voice consider this- from the beginning I thought he was an over the top version of Marty Balin & in fact he even covered The Airplanes "Today" in a studio rarity.